MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044093972 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.064107

Damped soft phonons and diffuse scattering in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>40</mml:mn><mml:mo>%</mml:mo><mml:mi>Pb</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∕</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>Nb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>∕</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>−</mml:mtext><mml:mn>60</mml:mn><mml:mo>%</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>PbTiO</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2006· article· lv· W2044093972 on OpenAlexafffund
Chris Stock, David S. Ellis, I. P. Swainson, Guangyong Xu, Haruhiro Hiraka, Z. Zhong, Hongzhi Luo, Xiangyong Zhao, D. Viehland, R. J. Birgeneau, G. Shirane

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2006
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Toronto
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchUniversity of TorontoU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsTetragonal crystal systemPhononCondensed matter physicsScatteringMaterials scienceAnisotropyPolarPhysicsCrystallographyOpticsChemistryCrystal structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using neutron elastic and inelastic scattering and high-energy x-ray diffraction, we present a comparison of $40%\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{Pb}({\mathrm{Mg}}_{1∕3}{\mathrm{Nb}}_{2∕3}){\mathrm{O}}_{3}\text{\ensuremath{-}}60%\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{PbTiO}}_{3}$ (PMN-60PT) with pure $\mathrm{Pb}({\mathrm{Mg}}_{1∕3}{\mathrm{Nb}}_{2∕3}){\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ (PMN) and ${\mathrm{PbTiO}}_{3}$ (PT). We measure the structural properties of PMN-60PT to be identical to pure PT, however, the lattice dynamics are exactly that previously found in relaxors PMN and $\mathrm{Pb}({\mathrm{Zn}}_{1∕3}{\mathrm{Nb}}_{2∕3}){\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ (PZN). PMN-60PT displays a well-defined macroscopic structural transition from a cubic to tetragonal unit cell at $550\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$. The diffuse scattering is shown to be weak indicating that the structural distortion is long-range in PMN-60PT and short-range polar correlations (polar nanoregions) are not present. Even though polar nanoregions are absent, the soft optic mode is short-lived for wave vectors near the zone center. Therefore PMN-60PT displays the same waterfall effect as prototypical relaxors PMN and PZN. We conclude that it is random fields resulting from the intrinsic chemical disorder which is the reason for the broad transverse optic mode observed in PMN and PMN-60PT near the zone center and not due to the formation of short-ranged polar correlations. Through our comparison of PMN, PMN-60PT, and pure PT, we interpret the dynamic and static properties of the $\mathrm{PMN}\text{\ensuremath{-}}x\mathrm{PT}$ system in terms of a random field model in which the cubic anisotropy term dominates with increasing doping of ${\mathrm{PbTiO}}_{3}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1450.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207