Ancestral reconstruction of the ligand-binding pocket of Family C G protein-coupled receptors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) within the Family C subclass of G protein-coupled receptors are crucial modulators of synaptic transmission. However, their closest relatives include a diverse group of sensory receptors whose biological functions are not associated with neurotransmission, raising the question of the evolutionary origin of amino acid-binding Family C receptors. A common feature of most, if not all, functional Family C receptors is the presence of an amino acid-binding site localized within the large extracellular Venus flytrap domain. Here, we used maximum likelihood methods to infer the ancestral state of key residues in the amino acid-binding pocket of a primordial Family C receptor. These residues were reconstructed in the background of the fish 5.24 chemosensory receptor, a broad-spectrum amino acid-activated receptor. Unlike the WT 5.24 receptor, which was not activated by mGluR agonists and displayed low sensitivity toward l-glutamate, the reconstructed ancestral receptor possessed a pharmacological profile characterized by high affinity for both l-glutamate and selective Group I mGluR agonists. This pharmacological phenotype could be largely recapitulated by mutating only two residues in the 5.24 receptor-binding pocket. Our results suggest that this primordial Family C receptor may have arisen early in metazoan evolution and that it already was preadapted as a glutamate receptor for its later use at excitatory synapses in glutamate-mediated neurotransmission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".