Evaluation of soft computing algorithms for estimation of spatial transmissivity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper explored the potential of inverse technique using adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), self-organised maps (SOMs) and M5P model tree-based regression approach to estimate the spatial transmissivity of aquifer domain. The study is based on coupling of finite element method (FEM)-soft computing (ANFIS, SOMs, M5P) model, which serve as forward (FEM) and inverse (ANN, SOMs, M5P) models. The root mean square error, coefficient of correlation and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency index are used as comparison criteria for evaluating the models. The results from this study suggest that M5P model tree-based modelling approach is superior in accuracy in comparison to the ANFIS and SOMs model investigated in this study. This study also suggests that M5P model trees, being analogous to piecewise linear functions, have advantages over other techniques as they offer more insight into the developed model and are very efficient in training, and always converge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it