Self-Assembled Colloidal Arrays as Three-Dimensional Nanofluidic Sieves for Separation of Biomolecules on Microchips
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report on a biomolecular sieving system based on the use of ordered colloidal arrays to define the sieve structure within a microfluidic device. A facile microfluidic colloidal self-assembly strategy has been developed to create ordered, robust, three-dimensional nanofluidic sieves within microfluidic devices, with which fast separation of DNA and proteins of a wide size range was achieved. Compared to conventional colloidal deposition procedures, such as vertical deposition, this approach features much faster assembling speed, the absence of drying-caused cracks that may jeopardize the separation performance, and better flexibility to couple with current microfabrication techniques. The flexibility of pore size enabled by this methodology provides separation of biomolecules with a wide size distribution, ranging from proteins (20-200 kDa) to dsDNA (0.05-50 kbp). Under moderate electric fields, complete separation can be finished in minutes, with separation efficiency comparable to gel/polymer-filled or micro-/nanofabricated microsystems. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of size separation of biomolecules within self-assembled ordered colloidal lattices embedded within a microfluidic system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it