The Role of Collagen Type I on Hematopoietic and Mesenchymal Stem Cells Expansion and Differentiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The three dimensional scaffold of the bone marrow (BM) niches is composed of various elements including extracellular matrix proteins and cell types, such as collagen type I (Col I) and stroma cells. Interaction of stem cells with their microenvironment is important for their regulation. In the marrow, Col I is mostly localized in the endosteal regions. The objective of this work was to investigate the role of Col I in the regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells (HSC) and Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) growth. Col I was extracted from rat tail tendons and its purity confirmed. Human BM MSCs and umbilical cord blood (UCB) CD34+ cells were used as Stem Cell sources. MSCs were cultured in medium with serum while CB CD34+ cells were cultured without serum with cytokines. The impact of increasing concentrations of Col I (0-50 µg mL-1 for coating) on the growth of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells (HPC) and MSCs was investigated by cytometry, microscopy and clonogenic progenitor assays. Only a minority of CD34+ cells expressed the Col I receptor α2β1 prior to culture, while the opposite was observed when hematopoietic cells were placed in culture. Col I coated surfaces reduced the expansion of hematopoietic cells by 25% compared to control, while expansions of myeloid and MK progenitors were either unchanged or negatively affected by Col I, respectively. The differentiation of HPCs was also affected on Col I as demonstrated by differences in the frequencies of various cell lineages, such as CD34+ cells, megakaryocytes (MK), erythrocytes and others. In contrast to HPCs, Col I surfaces increased MSCs proliferation but had little impact on osteoblasts derived from MSCs. Taken together, this study provides new insights into the regulatory activities of Col I on Stem Cells residing in the marrow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".