Decomposition of intramuscular EMG signals using a knowledge -based certainty classifier algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An automated system for resolving an intramuscular electromyographic (EMG) signal into its constituent motor unit potential trains (MUPTs) is presented. The system is intended mainly for clinical applications where several physiological parameters for each motor unit (MU), such as the motor unit potential (MUP) template and mean firing rate, are required. The system decomposes an EMG signal off-line by filtering the signal, detecting MUPs, and then grouping the detected MUPs using a clustering and a supervised classification algorithm. Both the clustering and supervised classification algorithms use MUP shape and MU firing pattern information to group MUPs into several MUPTs. Clustering is partially based on the K-means clustering algorithm. Supervised classification is implemented using a certainty-based classifier technique that employs a knowledge-based system to merge trains, detect and correct invalid trains, as well as adjust the assignment threshold for each train. The accuracy (93.2%±5.5%), assignment rate (93.9%±2.6%), and error in estimating the number of MUPTs (0.3±0.5) achieved for 10 simulated EMG signals comprised of 3-11 MUPTs are encouraging for using the system for decomposing various EMG signals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".