MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044177055 · doi:10.1080/01459350903107327

Boundaries and the Exploration of Self

2008· article· en· W2044177055 on OpenAlexaff
Kiaras Gharabaghi

Bibliographic record

VenueChild & Youth Services · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Policy and Administration Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)Boundary (topology)Boundary-workStructure and agencyProfessional boundariesPower (physics)EpistemologySelfSociologySocial psychologyPsychologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceSocial scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Boundaries and the exploration of self are conceptualized within the agency-structure problem first articulated in social theory during the 1970s. Constructing boundaries as a professional issue within the discipline has to take account the agency embedded within boundaries. Multiple boundary dilemmas are discussed within the framework of the agency-structure problem, including those that result from policies and procedures, and it is further argued that boundaries and the exploration of self also impact at the team level. Finally, the role of power imbalances within the practice of boundary formation is explored in relational worker–client interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChild & Youth ServicesSame topicPublic Policy and Administration ResearchFrench-language works237,207