MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044230990 · doi:10.3354/dao073023

Genotyping of marine viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus isolated from the Flemish Cap by nucleotide sequence analysis and restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns

2006· article· en· W2044230990 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carmen López‐Vázquez, RS Raynard, N Bain, M.H. Snow, Isabel Bandı́n, Carlos P. Dopazo

Bibliographic record

VenueDiseases of Aquatic Organisms · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAquaculture disease management and microbiota
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyRestriction fragment length polymorphismGenotypeGenotypingVirologyOutbreakSequence analysisGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A total of 14 viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV) isolates obtained from Greenland halibut Reinhardtius hippoglossoides caught at the Flemish Cap, a fishing ground in the North Atlantic Ocean near Newfoundland, were characterised using restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and nucleotide sequence analysis. RFLP analysis was performed on a 1259 bp fragment of the glycoprotein (G) gene, and a 305 nucleotide region within the nucleoprotein (N) gene was used for sequence analysis. Representative strains of the 4 established genotypes were employed for comparative purposes. Sequencing analysis indicated that the Flemish cap isolates grouped in Genotype 3, which also includes isolates from wild fish caught in the North Sea and coastal waters of the UK and Ireland, isolates derived from outbreaks of VHS in turbot farms in the British Isles, and an isolate from European eel Anguilla anguilla caught in northern France. Characterisation using RFLPs resulted in the development of a simple and reliable method of typing VHSV at the genotype level using a 2-step restriction analysis (2-SRA) assay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiseases of Aquatic OrganismsSame topicAquaculture disease management and microbiotaFrench-language works237,207