MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044248191 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2014.0023

Picturing the “English Roadside”: George Meredith’s Poetry and Once a Week

2014· article· en· W2044248191 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rebecca Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryGeorge (robot)AmbivalenceLiteratureIdealismArtEnglish poetryHistoryPhilosophyArt historyPsychologyPsychoanalysisEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article suggests that the critical response to George Meredith’s Modern Love and Poems of the English Roadside (1862) carries the residue of the well-loved illustrated versions of the Roadside poems that earlier appeared in the weekly journal Once a Week . These poems feature speakers whose ambivalence challenges ideals of simplistic nationalism and rustic folksiness, yet this idealism is amplified in the accompanying illustrations. Using “Juggling Jerry” and “The Old Chartist” as examples, this article considers the ways in which these illustrations inform the responses of later readers and critics of Meredith’s verse, at times overriding the content of the poems themselves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207