A 10Gb/s active-inductor structure with peaking control in 90nm CMOS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A PMOS-based active inductor circuit for high-speed I/O applications is presented. The active inductor can operate with low voltage headroom and requires no voltage boosting. A prototype output driver circuit using the active inductor is implemented in 90 nm CMOS. The peaking frequency and its corresponding gain magnitude of the active-inductor circuit can be adjusted to facilitate channel loss compensation. Operating at 10 Gb/s over a 6-in FR4 channel, as compared to the case when the active-inductor structure is disabled, the use of active inductor circuit in the transmitter side increases the vertical eye opening at the receiver side by a factor of two and reduces the peak-to-peak jitter of the received data by 30%. By keeping the current of the active inductor above a certain value, impedance variations are minimized and appropriate impedance matching is achieved (S <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">22</sub> less than -10 dB). The active-inductor circuit occupies 17 times 25 mum <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> and has a low overhead power consumption of 0.8 mW, i.e., ~10% of the overall power of the prototype output driver.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".