Kinetic Studies on Cure Kinetics of DGEBA (Diglycidyl Ether of Bisphenol-A) with Terephthalamide Hardening System generated from PET waste
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An aromatic amide system for epoxy resin based on diglycidyl ether of Bisphenol-A was developed through ammonolysis of PET waste. The ammonolysis of PET waste was carried out at ambient conditions of temperature & pressure. The end product, characterized as terephthalamide was used as hardener in epoxy resin (Diglycidal ether of Bisphenol-A) and triethylamine and sodium hydroxide were used as catalysts. Several samples were used to study the curing kinetics having varying amounts of the catalysts by means of Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Isothermal and Dynamic DSC characterization of the formulations were performed. The curing kinetics of terephthalamide with epoxy resin shows high energy of activation as 50.18 KJ/mole in the absence of catalyst which was lowered towards negative values in their presence. The optimum curing of epoxy resin heated with aromatic hardener can be obtained in 28 minutes at 320 ˚C. The use of catalysts reduced the curing time to 2.0 minutes at 60 ˚C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".