MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fetal Femur Fracture and External Cephalic Version

2004· article· en· W2044275498 on OpenAlexaff
Steven Papp, Gupreet Dhaliwal, Greg Davies, Dan Borschneck

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrics and Gynecology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy-related medical research
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreech presentationExternal cephalic versionPresentation (obstetrics)ComplicationFemur fractureSurgeryFemoral fractureFetal distressGestationFemurPregnancyObstetricsFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Femoral fractures due to birth trauma are extremely rare. External cephalic version is considered a relatively safe alternative when dealing with breech presentation, but it can be associated with complications. CASE: This patient underwent elective cephalic version for breech presentation at 36 weeks of gestation. Due to concerns of fetal distress after the version, a cesarean delivery was performed. The newborn had a bruised leg at delivery, and X-ray studies confirmed a distal femoral corner fracture. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates another risk of external cephalic version. Physicians and patients should be aware of this potential complication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrics and GynecologySame topicPregnancy-related medical researchFrench-language works237,207