MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044285109 · doi:10.1139/v04-041

The ν<sub>1</sub> and ν<sub>2</sub> vibrational bands of the OCCN radical detected through time-resolved Fourier transform IR emission spectroscopy

2004· article· en· W2044285109 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
William McNavage, William P. Dailey, Hai‐Lung Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPhotodissociationSpectroscopyRadicalExcited stateEmission spectrumFourier transform infrared spectroscopyInfrared spectroscopyDissociation (chemistry)InfraredPhotochemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanosecondFourier transform spectroscopySpectral linePhysical chemistryAtomic physicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through monitoring the IR emission from vibrationally excited radicals generated by exothermic photolysis reactions, the CN stretch (ν 1 ) and the CO stretch (ν 2 ) vibrational bands of the cyanooxomethyl radical (OCCN) have been observed for the first time at 2093 cm –1 and 1774 cm –1 , respectively. The OCCN radical was produced through 193 nm photolysis of methyl cyanoformate (NCC(O)OCH 3 ), carbonyl cyanide (NCC(O)CN), and pivaloyl cyanide (NCC(O)C(CH 3 ) 3 ). The IR emission spectra were recorded by using nanosecond time-resolved Fourier transform IR emission spectroscopy. Assignments of the spectral peaks were made based on observed time and pressure dependences of IR emission intensities, ab initio calculations, and two-dimensional cross-spectra correlation analysis. Key words: radical, cyanooxomethyl, OCCN, time-resolved vibrational spectroscopy, FTIR, substituted carbonyl dissociation reactions, two-dimensional cross-spectra correlation analysis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207