MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044289854 · doi:10.2500/105065800779954383

Biophysics of Nasal Airflow: A Review

2000· review· en· W2044289854 on OpenAlex
P. L. Cole

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Rhinology · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAirflowAirwayComponent (thermodynamics)RhinomanometryNoseAnatomyAnesthesiaMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An account is given of the constituents of the flow resistive nasal valve, their aerodynamic function, and the essential role they play in processing inspiratory air. The relatively fixed structural component and the variable mucovascular components of the lateral and medial nasal walls are described, and particular attention is drawn to the septal mucovascular component because its existence is not universally recognized. Common sources of error in subjective and objective assessments of obstruction to nasal respiratory airflow are discussed. Comments are presented advocating limitations of surgical interference in the treatment of mucosal and structural nasal airway obstruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it