MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044293026 · doi:10.7202/019292ar

L’impact des politiques institutionnelles sur la création d’opéra au Canada entre 1980 et 2003 : Les cas de Montréal et Toronto1

2008· article· fr· W2044293026 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sophie M. Bisson

Bibliographic record

VenueIntersections Canadian Journal of Music · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’analyse des différents programmes d’aide offerts par les conseils des arts canadiens révèle que l’aide financière gouvernementale est insuffisante pour permettre la création régulière d’oeuvres opératiques. L’étude du fonctionnement des organismes professionnels qui bénéficient de ces programmes d’aide (incluant les ateliers professionnels et universitaires), ainsi que l’étude des mécanismes entourant la création d’un opéra (de sa commande à sa réalisation), démontre que l’essentiel des fonds contribue au fonctionnement des différents organismes lyriques du pays et non à la création. Pour permettre la création d’opéra au Canada, les créateurs doivent emprunter le chemin de la compagnie lyrique et non de la maison d’opéra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntersections Canadian Journal of MusicSame topicCultural Industries and Urban DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207