L’impact des politiques institutionnelles sur la création d’opéra au Canada entre 1980 et 2003 : Les cas de Montréal et Toronto1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’analyse des différents programmes d’aide offerts par les conseils des arts canadiens révèle que l’aide financière gouvernementale est insuffisante pour permettre la création régulière d’oeuvres opératiques. L’étude du fonctionnement des organismes professionnels qui bénéficient de ces programmes d’aide (incluant les ateliers professionnels et universitaires), ainsi que l’étude des mécanismes entourant la création d’un opéra (de sa commande à sa réalisation), démontre que l’essentiel des fonds contribue au fonctionnement des différents organismes lyriques du pays et non à la création. Pour permettre la création d’opéra au Canada, les créateurs doivent emprunter le chemin de la compagnie lyrique et non de la maison d’opéra.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".