MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044333204 · doi:10.1094/pd-90-1457a

Detection of <i>Citrus exocortis viroid, Iresine viroid</i>, and <i>Tomato chlorotic dwarf viroid</i> in New Ornamental Host Plants in India

2006· article· en· W2044333204 on OpenAlexaff
R. P. Singh, Andrea D. Dilworth, V. K. Baranwal, K. N. Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViroidBiologyOrnamental plantPlant virusPotato spindle tuber viroidDwarfingVirologyBotanyVirusRootstock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Columnea latent viroid, originating from ornamental plants, is known to be harmful to crop plants (2). Despite the potential threat to crop plants, the importance of ornamental plants in viroid evolution is not fully appreciated. Availability of a Pospiviroid genus-specific primer pair (1) to detect the most prevalent viroids in ornamental plants and a simplified nucleic acid preparation protocol (3) for use in reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) have facilitated surveys of ornamental plants for pospiviroids. Using the above protocol in India, leaf and shoot samples were collected randomly from roadside beds consisting of ground covers or creepers/trailing plants at the IARI campus, New Delhi. These were extracted in 50 mM NaOH + 2.5 mM EDTA solution, centrifuged to sediment the coarse debris from sap, and 10 μl of the supernatant was spotted on a nitrocellulose membrane. Individual spots were eluted with distilled sterile water (30 μl) and the eluates were used for RT-PCR detection of viroids (3). Amplified fragments or subsequently cloned plasmids were also purified using NaOH-EDTA membrane protocol. Cloning and sequencing of amplicons (195 to 224 bp) revealed a very high sequence identity with specific viroids from the viroid sequence database (NCBI). Among the 19 plant samples assayed, only three plant species were infected by viroids, although none of them exhibited any symptoms. The three plant species included: (i) moss verbena, Glandularia puchella (Verbenaceae, native to Argentina and Chile, now established in several regions of the world), infected with a viroid (Accession No. DQ846884) having 99% sequence identity to Citrus exocortis viroid (CEVd) (Accession No. S67446); (ii) trailing verbena, Verbena × hybrida (Verbenaceae, ornamental plant), doubly infected with a viroid (Accession No. DQ846885) having 95% sequence identity to CEVd (Accession No. DQ094297) and infected with another viroid (Accession No. DQ846883) having 98% sequence identity to Tomato chlorotic dwarf viroid (TCDVd) (Accession No. AF162131); and (iii) red joyweed, Alternanthera sessilis (Amaranthaceae, a perennial weed herb) infected with a viroid (Accession No. DQ846886) having 96% sequence identity to Iresine viroid (IrVd) (Accession No. DQ094293). CEVd and TCDVd were mechanically transferred to tomato seedlings causing reduced growth of plants, smaller leaves, and bunchy-top appearance of plants, symptoms similar to those typically observed with other isolates of these viroids. As expected from previous studies, IrVd was not transmitted to tomato plants. Natural infection of verbena with CEVd has been detected in North America (2) but this was a novel observation in India. Additional novel observations include: A. sessilis as a new host for IrVd; and TCDVd is the first crop viroid to be isolated from a naturally infected ornamental plant. The significance of these viroid findings in ground cover and widely grown ornamental plants may lie in their potential role in spreading the viroids to citrus plants in citrus-growing countries such as India. References: (1) H. Bostan et al. J. Virol. Methods 116:189, 2004, (2) R. P. Singh and J. A. Teixeira da Silva. Floriculture, Ornamental Plant Biotechnol. 3:531, 2006. (3) R. P. Singh et al. J. Virol. Methods 132:204, 2006.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207