MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044347869 · doi:10.1063/1.1378038

A dynamic subfilter-scale model for plane parallel flows

2001· article· en· W2044347869 on OpenAlexaff
B. Dubrulle, Jean-Philippe Laval, Sergey Nazarenko, Nicholas Kevlahan

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsTurbulenceReynolds numberPlane (geometry)GeometryMathematical analysisReynolds stressLength scaleScale (ratio)Flow (mathematics)MechanicsStatistical physicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a dynamic model of the subfiltered scales in plane parallel geometry using a generalized, stochastic rapid distortion theory (RDT). This new model provides expressions for the turbulent Reynolds subfilter-scale stresses via estimates of the subfilter velocities rather than velocity correlations. Subfilter-scale velocities are computed using an auxiliary equation which is derived from the Navier–Stokes equations using a simple model of the subfilter energy transfers. It takes the shape of a RDT equation for the subfilter velocities, with a stochastic forcing. An analytical test of our model is provided by assuming delta-correlation in time for the supergrid energy transfers. It leads to expressions for the Reynolds stresses as a function of the mean flow gradient in the plane parallel geometry and can be used to derive mean equilibrium profiles both in the near-wall and core regions. In the near-wall region we derive a general expression for the velocity profile which is linear in the viscous layer and logarithmic outside. This expression involves two physical parameters: the von Karman constant and the size of the viscous layer (which can be computed via a numerical implementation of our model). Fits of experimental profiles using our general formula provides reasonable values of these parameters (κ=0.4 to κ=0.45, the size of the viscous layer is about 15 wall units). In the core region, we find that the shape of the profile depends on the geometry of the flow; it ranges from algebraic in channel flow, to exponential in the bulk of boundary layers, and linear in plane Couette flow. This classification is consistent with Oberlack’s system, which is based on symmetry arguments. Fits of boundary layer flows or channel flows at different Reynolds number over the whole flow region are performed using our results, and are found to be in very good agreement with available data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score0.793

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207