La plateforme référentielle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En application de la loi du 17 Juin 1998, les dispositifs de soins ambulatoires aux Auteurs d’Infraction à Caractère Sexuel (AICS) s’affinent. Ils s’appuient sur le cadre légal de l’injonction de soins et confie au médecin coordonnateur la mission d’évaluer la qualité du travail thérapeutique réalisé par le patient probationnaire. En Rhône-Alpes, les plateformes référentielles (PFR) ont été créées au sein de CMP volontaires à la suite du plan de prévention de la récidive de 2009. En lien avec le CRIAVS (Centre Ressource pour les Intervenants auprès des Auteurs de Violence Sexuelle), elles répondent à quatre missions : accueillir, évaluer, orienter et éventuellement soigner. L’expérience de la PFR roannaise aborde la question de l’aspect qualitatif des soins et de l’évaluation du risque de récidive, sans réduire la personne aux actes qu’elle a commis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".