Immune‐mediated alteration in gut physiology and its role in host defence in nematode infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Activation of the mucosal immune system of the gastrointestinal tract in nematode infection results in altered intestinal physiology, which includes changes in intestinal motility and mucus production. These changes are considered to be under direct immunological control rather than a non-specific consequence of the inflammatory reaction to the infective agent. However, little is known about the immunological basis for the changes in intestinal physiology accompanying nematode infection, or the precise role of these changes in host defence, which remains an important area to explore. In this review we describe the mechanisms by which the immune response to nematode infection influences the changes in two major cells of intestinal physiology, namely smooth muscle and goblet cells, and how these changes in intestinal physiology contribute to the host defence. Data clearly demonstrate that the T helper (Th) 2 type immune response generated by nematode infection plays an important role in the development of infection-induced intestinal muscle hypercontractility and goblet cell hyperplasia and that these immune-mediated changes in intestinal physiology are associated with worm expulsion. These observations strongly suggest that intestinal muscle contractility, goblet cell hyperplasia and worm expulsion share a common immunological basis and may be causally related. These data not only provide insights into host defence in nematode infection in the context of muscle function and goblet cell response, but also have broad implications in elucidating the pathophysiology of a wide range of gastrointestinal disorders associated with altered gut physiology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".