A Computational Study of Sprays Produced by Rotary Cage Atomizers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article describes a computational study of poly-dispersed droplet spray plumes produced by Micronair AU4000 and AU6539 rotary cage atomizers that are commonly used in agriculture and forestry management. It combines experimental measurements of the droplet size spectrum and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods to develop a comprehensive understanding of droplet dispersion and spatial segregation in the near wake of the atomizer. The results will assist the development of improved measurement methodologies of pesticide droplet spectra. A parametric study of the Micronair AU4000 atomizer examines the effects of air speed, atomizer speed, liquid flow rate, and power source on spatial segregation of the plume. The RANS model uses a combined Lagrangian (droplet phase) and Eulerian (gas phase) procedure and includes the sprayer with blades and a large portion of the wind tunnel geometry. The computational results are compared to full-scale experimental measurements of pressure, gas phase velocity, turbulence intensity, and droplet size spectra measured using phase Doppler interferometry (PDI).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".