MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044447949 · doi:10.1109/vppc.2014.7007066

Event-Based Electric Vehicle Mass and Grade Estimation

2014· article· en· W2044447949 on OpenAlexafffund
Khalil Maleej, Sousso Kélouwani, Yves Dubé, Kodjo Agbossou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAccelerationComputer scienceEvent (particle physics)TorqueForgettingElectric vehicleControl theory (sociology)Automotive engineeringPower (physics)SimulationEngineeringArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work investigates an event-based electric vehicle mass and grade estimation using a Recursive Least Squares (RSL) with variable forgetting factors method. Given the vehicle speed and electric power consumption, we proposed a two-layer identification architecture in which the first layer provides acceleration and cruise motion periods, whereas the second layer is responsible for mass and grade parameter estimations. The forgetting factors are updated based on the vehicle acceleration values. The proposed method does not require torque measurements from the propulsion system. Therefore, it can be used for different type of vehicles. The preliminary comparative study suggests that the proposed method is efficient and can provide satisfactory results even in presence of noisy measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207