Isolation and characterization of carbonic anhydrases from the marine diatom <i>Phaeodactylum tricornutum</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carbonic anhydrase (CA) isozymes were identified and isolated from three strains of Phaeodactylum tricornutum [University of Texas Culture Collection (UTEX 640), North Eastern Pacific Culture Collection at the University of British Columbia B31 and Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa 1052/1A]. External (CAext) and internal CA activity was detected by potentiometric assay of intact cells and cell homogenates of air and high CO2‐grown cells. CAext was detected only in UTEX 640 grown under CO2‐limited conditions and present in trace amounts in cells grown on high CO2. CA isozymes in cells extracts were separated by cellulose acetate electrophoresis and by sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. All three strains had two CA bands in common, while UTEX 640 had a third, faster‐running band which was absent from extracts of high CO2‐grown cells and thus was the external isozyme. The internal CA isoforms of the UTEX 640 strain were shown to have molecular masses of 28 and 25 kDa, and the external 24 kDa. A fourth CAext isozyme with a molecular weight of 23.5 kDa was later detected using a polyclonal CA antibody. The CA isozymes were low‐CO2‐inducible proteins because Western blot analysis, using a polyclonal antibody, indicated that CA expression was repressed in high CO2‐grown cells. CA localization, using both immunofluorescence and immunogold techniques, with air‐grown cells indicated that the CAext was located in the periplasmic space and on the cell membrane, whereas in high CO2‐grown cells only internal CA was detected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".