MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044469909 · doi:10.1002/aic.690480209

Continuous protein recovery with a liquid–solid circulating fluidized‐bed ion exchanger

2002· article· en· W2044469909 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFreezing and Crystallization Processes
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBovine serum albuminChromatographyChemistryIon exchangeFluidized bed combustionAdsorptionDesorptionFluidized bedIon-exchange resinAlbuminChemical engineeringIonBiochemistryInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A liquid–solid circulating fluidized‐bed (LSCFB) ion‐exchange system was developed for continuous protein recovery. It contains a downcomer for protein adsorption and a riser for protein desorption, with ion‐exchange particles circulating continuously between the two columns. Effects of the operating conditions on the hydrodynamics and the continuous ion exchange of bovine serum albumin (BSA) in the system were investigated. Under typical operating conditions, up to 98% BSA was adsorbed in the downcomer (showing a very high efficiency of protein removal from the feed), and an overall protein recovery of up to 84% was obtained in the LSCFB system, indicating that the LSCFB system was a very promising strategy for the continuous recovery of proteins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it