MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Contrasts in the hypo‐osmoregulatory abilities of a freshwater and an anadromous population of inconnu

2001· article· en· W2044477320 on OpenAlexaff
Katie E. Howland, William M. Tonn, Greg G. Goss

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fish Biology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFish migrationBrackish waterAcclimatizationBiologyJuvenileOsmoregulationSalinityEcologyPopulationFisheryZoologyFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Juvenile freshwater and anadromous inconnu Stenodus leucichthys regulated plasma ions following a direct transfer from fresh to brackish water (10–15‰), but suffered osmoregulatory collapse with 100% mortality in 48 h when directly transferred to 25‰ salinity. Acclimation to brackish water for 2 weeks improved hypo‐osmoregulatory capacity in both populations, with acclimated fish showing smaller increases in blood plasma ion concentrations, higher Na+‐K+ ATPase activity, and lower mortality than non‐acclimated fish following transfer to 25‰ sea water. Anadromous inconnu maintained pre‐treatment plasma ion levels during acclimation, whereas these levels increased during acclimation in freshwater inconnu. Juvenile anadromous inconnu are therefore able to adapt physiologically to sea water of at least 25‰, if brackish‐water acclimation is available, but freshwater inconnu have diminished saltwater tolerance, relative to the anadromous form.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fish BiologySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207