Enantioseparation of racemic mandelic acid by simulated moving bed chromatography using Chiralcel‐OD column
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chiral separation of the racemic mandelic acid (( R,S )‐MA) by simulated moving bed chromatography with columns packed with Chiralcel‐OD stationary phase is investigated experimentally and numerically. The transport dispersion model combined with the modified Langmuir isotherm was applied to predict the dynamic behaviour and separation performance of the SMB process. The Triangle Theory was used to obtain the complete separation region of the SMB operation. The influences of the switching time, loading, extract flow rate and column configuration on the SMB performance were also studied. The online monitoring system consisting of circular dichroism (CD) and UV detector in series was employed to measure the composition and purity of the extract and raffinate streams. Good agreement between the experimental data and model predictions proved the efficiency and reliability of SMB modelling and the Triangle theory in the design and operation of SMB chromatography. Experimental results show that purity and recovery at extract and raffinate port can reach 99% although not at the same time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".