MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044477653 · doi:10.1109/vcip.2011.6115909

Image matting based on mutual information

2011· article· en· W2044477653 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaozhou Zhou, Pierre Boulanger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov random fieldImage (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceSimilarity (geometry)PixelComputer scienceComputer visionMarkov chainEnergy (signal processing)Function (biology)Image qualityPattern recognition (psychology)Mutual informationImage editingMathematicsImage segmentationStatisticsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel framework to solve the image matting problem. We design a temporary image based on the estimated foreground and background colors for unknown pixels as well as an initial matte. The similarity of the temporary image and original image is modeled as an energy function in the Markov Random Field (MRF). The global optimized matte is obtained by minimizing the energy function. Therefore, image matting is converted to how to maximize the similarity of the original image and the temporary image. The experiments demonstrate that the proposed method could produce high quality mattes and it is also more effective compared to other top ranking methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Enhancement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207