MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044486890 · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-0959

Direct Cost Analyses of Palivizumab Treatment in a Cohort of At-Risk Children: Evidence From the North Carolina Medicaid Program

2004· article· en· W2044486890 on OpenAlexaff
Steven E. Wegner, Julie Jacobson Vann, Gordon Liu, Patricia J. Byrns, Clement Cypra, William J. Campbell, Alan D. Stiles

Bibliographic record

VenuePEDIATRICS · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
FundersAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality
KeywordsPalivizumabMedicinePediatricsMedicaidCohortGestational ageCohort studyRespiratory systemHealth carePregnancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Use of palivizumab prophylactic therapy reduces the occurrence of hospitalizations for serious respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract infections in at-risk infants. The direct cost-benefit of palivizumab prophylaxis for infants who are born at 32 to 35 weeks' estimated gestational age (EGA) during their first year of life has not been systematically examined. The objective of this study was to compare the direct costs of palivizumab prophylaxis and RSV treatment in infants who were born at 32 to 35 weeks EGA and received and did not receive palivizumab. METHODS: A cohort study was performed of infants who were younger than 1 year and were enrolled in an enhanced primary care case management model within the North Carolina Medicaid Program. Comparisons were made between infants who received (Synagis prophylaxis group) and did not receive palivizumab (nonprophylaxis group) during the study period. Cost was examined using the sum of Medicaid paid services for prophylaxis with palivizumab and treatment for RSV infections that occurred between October 1, 2002, and May 31, 2003. The Anderson framework was used to specify the regression cost models to compare the participants who received (Synagis prophylaxis) and did not receive (nonprophylaxis group) palivizumab. The primary outcomes were actual 7-month seasonal costs and standardized seasonal costs adjusting for the varied months of infant participation. RESULTS: The study sample included 185 Synagis prophylaxis and 182 nonprophylaxis participants who met the inclusion criteria. The average per-person total cost of RSV care and prophylaxis was 5117 dollars for the Synagis prophylaxis group and 371 dollars for the nonprophylaxis group. Five hospitalizations occurred in the prophylaxis group, and 12 occurred in the nonprophylaxis group (odds ratio: 0.27). No deaths occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Palivizumab administered to infants who were born at 32 to 35 weeks' EGA did not provide direct cost savings related to hospitalization or ambulatory care in a Medicaid population. The primary difference in cost between the groups was attributable to the palivizumab prophylaxis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEDIATRICSSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207