Modeling deformation behaviour of clay liners in a small centrifuge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In modern solid waste landfills, liner systems are essential structural elements that ensure that waste materials are safely separated from the environment. Many liner systems have been developed and used over the past decade. Among impermeable layers, clay liners are regarded as one of the very significant components of liner system and are being used worldwide as a waste containment system in landfills. One of the failures associated with clay liners is the occurrence of nonuniform settlements, resulting from the sudden collapse of waste, or the decomposition of waste materials, and (or) the subgrade over which the liner is laid. This paper deals with the use of a small centrifuge to model the deformation behaviour of clay liners. Model tests were performed in a small geotechnical centrifuge to investigate the behaviour of clay liners in landfills subjected to nonuniform settlements at sharp curvatures. A parametric study was conducted to analyze the influence of parameters like thickness, consistency, and overburden on the behaviour of clay liners. The clay liner without any overburden is observed to experience severe cracking in the form of deep and wide cracks at the maximum curvature zone. The depth and width of the cracks are found to decrease with an increase in clay liner thickness. The cracking failure pattern is suppressed by shearing for a clay liner with an increase in overburden pressure. Based on model test results, the clay liner with an adequate overburden is found to be free from cracking failure even when subjected to sharp curvatures. The effective usage of a small geotechnical centrifuge to model the deformation behaviour of clay liners is demonstrated adequately.Key words: landfills, municipal solid waste, clay liners, centrifuge modeling, nonuniform settlements, model tests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".