<i>Mariner</i> ( <i>Mos</i> 1) transposase and genomic integration of foreign gene sequences in <i>Bombyx mori</i> cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Widespread occurrence in insects and the capacity to transpose in the absence of host-derived factors means that mariner-like elements are considered to be attractive candidates for the development of a universal insect genetic transformation system. Here we show that the Mos1 mariner element of Drosophila mauritiana is capable of mediating excision and transposition events in a silkmoth (Bombyx mori) derived tissue culture cell line (Bm5 cells). Plasmid rescue assays, in combination with Southern hybridization and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses, confirm that the Mos1 transposase can mediate excision of DNA sequences, inserted between terminally repeated sequences recognized by the transposase, and integration into the chromosomal DNA of the Bm5 cells. In addition to chromosomal integration events, inter- and intraplasmid transposition and target element excision events were also detected. Approximately 50% of the plasmids recovered from plasmid rescue assays were found to contain the 'signature' of Mos1-specific excision and/or integration events, indicating that the mariner transposase functions efficiently in the Bombyx cells. Because mariner-induced excision and integration events are strictly dependent on the presence of a co-transfected Mos1 transposase expression vector, it is clear that the multiple copies of endogenous mariner-like elements (Bmmar1) that exist in the Bombyx genome are neither functional nor do they interfere with the efficiency of the transposition process. Thus, the Mos1 element and, probably, mariner elements, in general, hold great promise for the development of genetic transformation systems for lepidopteran insects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".