MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044514302 · doi:10.1353/can.0.0228

Rocke Robertson: Surgeon and Shepherd of Change (review)

2009· article· en· W2044514302 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Thomas Schlich

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsGovernment (linguistics)Media studiesPolitical scienceEconomic historyHistorySociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Rocke Robertson: Surgeon and Shepherd of Change Thomas Schlich Rocke Robertson: Surgeon and Shepherd of Change. Richard W. Pound. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2008. Pp. 344, $45.00 cloth This book is a biography of Rocke Robertson (1912–98), who was principal of McGill University from 1962 to 1970. These years saw significant change in universities around the world, and McGill was no exception. During Robertson’s term in office the university underwent an enormous expansion in students, staff, and facilities. At the same time, McGill’s governance went through a redistribution of power among the board of governors, staff, students, departments, divisions, and faculties, while financially it became ever more dependent on the funding of the provincial government. Robertson participated in all these events – events that represented, in fact, parts of more general developments of the time. One of these developments was the worldwide anti-authoritarian youth rebellion of the 1960s. Another was the anticlerical movement in Quebec society known as the Quiet Revolution. A third one concerned the efforts of many people in Quebec to gain more political independence from the rest of Canada, a movement that culminated in the October crisis of 1970. The key passages of the book tell the story of these events from Robertson’s perspective. We see him struggling with the provincial government to maintain the financial viability of his university. This [End Page 814] struggle is remarkable in that it had had profound political implications for the emergent French-language universities and a climate of growing political distrust towards the old English-speaking elite. For example, it forced Robertson to deal with the idea of provincial university financing as a zero-sum game. This would have meant that if the new French-language universities got more money, McGill would get less. A related issue came from the different cultures of university funding in English- and French-speaking environments. These differences led to the demand that the grant money McGill solicited from outside should be deducted from its share of provincial funding, a demand that Robertson made great efforts to fend off. In another chapter we see Robertson dealing with political unrest among students in the 1960s student rebellion, trying to maintain his and the institution’s authority and integrity against politically motivated provocations of all sorts. Reading the story from his specific perspective is very informative and helps readers to understand the university’s position within the changing political, social, and cultural landscape of that period. The book’s author, Richard W. Pound, is the present chancellor of McGill University. By profession he is a lawyer and partner of the law firm Stikeman Elliott. He is known to the wider public as a disputatious critic of doping practices in sports and former president of the Montreal-based World Anti-Doping Agency. His book on Robertson is based on a comprehensive study of primary archival sources, originating mostly from Robertson himself, such as his diaries, speeches, and letters. As befitting a biography, the narrative starts with Robertson’s family history and childhood, and continues with his education and medical training at McGill. One chapter is devoted to Robertson’s experience as a surgeon in the Second World War. The narrative then follows his surgical career, which, in 1959, led him to the position of head of the Department of Surgery at McGill and surgeon-in-chief at the Montreal General Hospital, a position that he gave up three years later to take on the office of the principal of McGill University. Robertson’s surgical career is relatively unremarkable but is of historical interest because it represents a typical case rather than that of an outstanding doctor and scientist. Based on a wealth of documents, the book provides ample detail about Robertson’s life, such as his career decisions or his grades at university, which are supplemented by long quotations from his letters and speeches. Most of Robertson’s personal life events are explained satisfactorily. There are a few weak points, however. Most importantly, Robertson’s exact function with regard to the changes in [End Page 815] McGill’s governance could have been made clearer. In which ways...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.317
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207