Geoducks ( <i>Panopea abrupta</i> ) as isotopic bioarchives of seasonality in the climate of British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Geochemical analyses of geoduck shells ( Panopea abrupta ) have yielded new high‐resolution isotope records of individual growth increments. The geoducks, which were collected from Parry Passage at Langara Island, British Columbia, are the most northern specimens that have yet been analyzed for stable oxygen and carbon isotopes. The isotope records represent the entire shell growth during the calendar years 1918, 1987, and 1991. The analyses showed that values of δ 18 O shell and δ 13 C shell vary within their growth increments. Temperature derived from δ 18 O shell is consistent with modern instrumental data of sea‐surface temperature. High‐resolution δ 18 O records from individual growth increments substantiate the assumption that they are formed annually. The instrumental data indicate that the growth season was from May through October/November. The sea temperature became gradually warmer during the beginning of the growth season, and decreased steeply during autumn. Similar subannual trends can be recognized in shells growing almost a century ago. Correlation between δ 18 O shell and δ 13 C shell is negative for 1917–1919 and 1986–1988, whereas the correlation is positive for 1990–1992. Differences in correlation may be related to the composition of available food particles, i.e., algal blooms and plant debris. The food composition is partially affected by the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). These findings have major implications for the understanding of the interpretation of carbon isotopes in marine bivalves. Because of their spatial and temporal distribution, the geoduck shells are highly suitable for oceanographic reconstructions using stable‐isotope analysis and sclerochronology. Furthermore, the large shell size and thickness and their deeply buried life position suggest a high preservation potential in ancient deposits. It is well known that the genus Panopea has a long‐range fossil record.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".