MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044519288 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2013.2264545

A Wideband Omnidirectional Horizontally Polarized Antenna for 4G LTE Applications

2013· article· en· W2044519288 on OpenAlexaff
Yiqiang Yu, Farid Jolani, Zhizhang Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOmnidirectional antennaRadiation patternPhysicsCoaxial antennaWidebandAntenna measurementOpticsAcousticsAntenna (radio)Computer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An innovative wideband omnidirectional horizontally polarized (HP) antenna is presented for 4G Long Term Evolution (LTE) wireless communication and networking systems. The proposed planar antenna consists of four pairs of flag-shaped radiators, a balun for balance-unbalance transformation, and four parasitical strips for bandwidth enhancement. Such a design enables in-phase and axially symmetric current flowing along the radiators. The measurements show that the proposed HP antenna exhibits a relative bandwidth of 41% with the return loss greater than or equal to 10 dB; it covers the frequency band of 1.76-2.68 GHz, including PCS, UMTS/LTE, Bluetooth, ISM, and WLAN bands. With an omnidirectional radiation pattern in E-plane, the proposed antenna has a peak gain of 3.6-4.2 dBi across the operational band and a radiation efficiency of 83%. The low profile and compact design, along with the omnidirectional radiation pattern, makes it ideal for ceiling or surface-mounted indoor and automobile 4G applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation LettersSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207