Role of Hydroxyurea in Treatment of Disease Due to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potential role of hydroxyurea in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was first supported by in vitro experiments that demonstrated control of viral production in activated and resting T cells. More recently, controlled clinical trials demonstrated that the addition of hydroxyurea to nucleoside-including regimens (chiefly of didanosine but also of stavudine and lamivudine) enhances their antiviral potency. It is believed that the cytostatic effect of hydroxyurea is at least partially responsible for its antiviral effect, through the down-modulation of cellular proliferation. Such an effect has also been credited for the blunted CD4 T cell responses that are characteristically observed when hydroxyurea is added to nucleoside-including regimens. The adjunctive antiviral effect of hydroxyurea-as well as its favorable dosing schedule, safety profile, and cost-makes it a very attractive addition to our therapeutic armamentarium. Further research is urgently needed to delineate the most appropriate use of this compound in the setting of HIV antiretroviral therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".