Measurement of the specific surface area of 176 snow samples using methane adsorption at 77 K
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To help quantify exchanges between the atmosphere and the snow cover, we have measured the specific surface area (SSA) of 176 snow samples taken from the seasonal snowpack in the Alps, Svalbard, and the Canadian high Arctic around Alert. A volumetric method was used, and the adsorption isotherm of CH 4 on snow at 77 K was recorded. The data were analyzed by the Brunauer‐Emmett‐Teller method to yield SSA and Δ Q CH4 , the mean heat of adsorption of the first CH 4 monolayer. SSA values obtained were between 100 and 1580 cm 2 /g. The reproducibility of the method is estimated at 6%, and the accuracy is estimated at 12%. We propose that Δ Q CH4 = 2240 ± 200 J/mol should be used as a criterion of reliability of the measurement. The method is described in detail to promote its use. Aged snow samples have lower SSA than fresh ones. The lowest values were found for faceted crystals and depth hoar, and the highest values were found for fresh rimed dendritic snow. A method that field investigators can use to estimate SSA from a visual examination of the snow and from a density measurement is suggested. Snow samples are classified into 14 types based on snow age and crystal shapes. Within each type, a density versus SSA correlation is determined. Our data indicate that, depending on snow type, SSA can then be estimated within 25 to 40% at the 1σ confidence level with the method proposed. Preliminary data suggest that SSA spatial variability of a given snow layer is low (<5%), but metamorphism can increase it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".