Structural characterization of the stigma-style complex of <i>Cynara cardunculus</i> (Asteraceae) and immunolocalization of cardosins A and B during floral development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies were carried out on the structure of the stigma and style of Cynara cardunculus L. (cardoon) during flower development. The stigma is of the dry type with a papillate cuticularized epidermis. During development, the unicellular papillae become match-stick shaped, cuticularize, and show an increase in vacuolar volume. In mature papillae, two morphologically different vacuoles were observed, one electron-dense and the other electron-transparent, putatively corresponding to distinct vacuolar populations. These vacuoles label differently for cardosin A, specifically detected in the electron-dense compartments. The style is solid with a cuticularized epidermis and a central core of transmitting tissue (TT) several cell layers thick. The TT cells show abundant rough endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi bodies, associated with active secretion. During maturation, TT cells become increasingly separated by a polysaccharide-rich extracellular matrix. Communication between TT cells is maintained via plasmodesmata in longitudinal walls. Distribution of cardosins A and B in developing C. cardunculus flowers was also characterized. The presence of aspartic proteinases (APs) in flowers is unusual, generally occurring at low levels. Cardosins A and B are always present in cardoon florets and localize at distinct pistil levels: stigma (papillae) and style (TT), respectively. This differential localization suggests distinct biological functions for cardosins, most likely essential for reproduction in this species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".