Combined spinal‐epidural as an alternative method of anaesthesia for a sigmoid‐colectomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We would like to report the case of an 82-year-old woman who required a sigmoid colectomy for carcinoma of the rectum. She is an ex-smoker, living in a nursing home, with a past medical history of congestive cardiac failure, hypertension, chronic obstructive airways disease and osteoporosis. The osteoporosis contributed to severe kyphosis (Fig. 8) leaving her with poor lung function (Table 1). Her exercise tolerance was 10–20 m with a Zimmer frame and she required four pillows for orthopnoea. Special investigations showed mild mitral regurgitation with left ventricular hypertrophy on echocardiograph; small bilateral effusions on chest X-ray and an arterial blood gas showing type 1 respiratory failure. We were concerned that a general anaesthetic would contribute to further respiratory failure requiring prolonged intensive care management and ventilation. After discussion with patient and family we opted for a combined spinal–epidural technique. Using an aseptic technique, we used a needle through needle technique (27 g/16 g-touhy) at L2−3 interspace. The spinal injection was 3 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% with fentanyl 25 µg. The epidural comprised a mixture of 15 ml of lidocaine 1%, and 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% over a period of 3 h, which was give in boluses of 5 ml. An arterial cannula was inserted into a radial artery for accurate blood pressure and blood gas monitoring. The patient was positioned head up with three pillows and a break in the table and received oxygen 5 l.min−1 through a Hudson mask. The surgeons could access the surgical field but there was an understanding that if the splenic flexure needed to be mobilised we would have no alternative than to change to a general anaesthetic. The procedure lasted 2.5 h and the patient received 1 l of colloid and 1.5 l of crystalloid. The blood loss was approximately 700 ml. Although arterial blood gasses showed an increasing respiratory acidosis, it had corrected itself on arrival in intensive care (Table 2). The patient stayed in intensive care for 2 days receiving 2 units of blood and was mobilizing around the surgical ward with her Zimmer frame by day 5. She was discharged from hospital a fortnight later. We undertook a literature search and accessed one case [1] that drew some comparison to our case. A patient with severe multiple sclerosis had a sigmoid colectomy for a volvulus and received a spinal anaesthetic with a spinal catheter; diamorphine was used via this catheter postoperatively with a similar favourable outcome as ours. Although a sigmoid colectomy is synonymous with a general anaesthetic, with the possibility of an epidural for intra- and postoperative analgesia, we would like to put forward this case as an alternative technique to the above mentioned operation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".