Elastodynamic Analysis of Aerial Refueling Hose Using Curved Beam Element
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The elastodynamic analysis of an aerial refueling hose by classic cable theory suffers the singularity problem when the hose slackens under dynamic loadings. The difficulty is addressed and overcome by modeling the refueling hose with a new three-noded locking-free curved beam element. The large deformations and rotations of curved beams are formulated in terms of an updated Lagrangian framework with consistently coupled quintic polynomial displacement fields to satisfy the membrane locking-free condition. The stability and accuracy of the new element is validated by experiments involving an instrumented free-swinging steel cable. Good agreement is observed between the experimental results and the predictions of the new element. The numerical capability of modeling a refueling hose and drogue system has been demonstrated by simulating 1) the oscillation of hose due to the disturbance from the tanker and the vortex-induced velocity and 2) a receiver coupling with a hose reel malfunction. The analysis results show clearly the formation and propagation of oscillations along the hose, the consequent whipping near the drogue, and the associated variation of hose tension. The results of new element agree well with field observations and existing analysis results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it