Photoexcited carrier relaxation dynamics and terahertz response of photoconductive antennas made on proton bombarded GaAs materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a model reproducing the instrumental response of a time-domain spectrometer that integrates photoconductive transmitter and receiver antennas made on identical proton-bombarded GaAs substrates. This model is used to determine the ultrafast capture time of the photoexcited carriers by the ion-bombardment-induced traps. A 0.5 ps capture time can be extracted for a low laser pump fluence of 0.66 μJ/cm2 per pulse. This carrier trapping time gets longer as the pump fluence increases. This behavior is explained by a gradual filling of the traps that are distributed over a 1 μm depth from the GaAs surface. This interpretation is supported by time-resolved measurements obtained on the same photoconductive material using both an 820 nm pump/terahertz-probe transmission experiment and a degenerate 760 nm pump/probe reflectivity experiment. The differential transmission and reflectivity dynamics are reproduced using a biexponential function which correctly describes the photoexcited carrier relaxation and transport dynamics in this material. The strong agreement observed between these different measurements reinforces the validity of the theoretical model used to reproduce the instrumental response of the terahertz setup.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".