Le vécu de la mixité conjugale chez les couples franco-maghrébins et la transmission identitaire aux enfants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’intéresse au processus de transmission identitaire confronté à l’expérience de la mixité conjugale. Alors que la descendance des unions mixtes questionne les appartenances identitaires, comment s’orientent les choix de transmission effectués par les parents? À travers le cas des couples franco-maghrébins résidant en région parisienne, nous rendrons compte des différentes questions voire des tensions familiales que la filiation soulève. Les choix de transmission sont autant de négociations conjugales et familiales qui renvoient aux couples la situation « illégitime » dans laquelle ils se trouvent. Nous verrons en quoi nous pouvons parler d’« illégitimité » conjugale. Puis, seront explorés différents exemples qui laissent transparaître, de manière notable, la situation « illégitime » que connaît le couple lors des choix opérés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".