Central infusion of aliskiren prevents sympathetic hyperactivity and hypertension in Dahl salt-sensitive rats on high salt intake
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Central infusion of an angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blocker prevents sympathetic hyperactivity and hypertension in Dahl salt-sensitive (S) rats on high salt. In the present study, we examined whether central infusion of a direct renin inhibitor exerts similar effects. Intracerebroventricular infusion of aliskiren at the rate of 0.05 mg/day markedly inhibited the increase in ANG II levels in the cerebrospinal fluid and in blood pressure (BP) caused by intracerebroventricular infusion of rat renin. In Dahl S rats on high salt, intracerebroventricular infusion of aliskiren at 0.05 and 0.25 mg/day for 2 wk similarly decreased resting BP in Dahl S rats on high salt. In other groups of Dahl S rats, high salt intake for 2 wk increased resting BP by ∼25 mmHg, enhanced pressor and sympathoexcitatory responses to air-stress, and desensitized arterial baroreflex function. All of these effects were largely prevented by intracerebroventricular infusion of aliskiren at 0.05 mg/day. Aliskiren had no effects in rats on regular salt. Neither high salt nor aliskiren affected hypothalamic ANG II content. These results indicate that intracerebroventricular infusions of aliskiren and an AT(1) receptor blocker are similarly effective in preventing salt-induced sympathetic hyperactivity and hypertension in Dahl S rats, suggesting that renin in the brain plays an essential role in the salt-induced hypertension. The absence of an obvious increase in hypothalamic ANG II by high salt, or decrease in ANG II by aliskiren, suggests that tissue levels do not reflect renin-dependent ANG II production in sympathoexcitatory angiotensinergic neurons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".