MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044648120 · doi:10.1139/s08-007

Black liquor and alkaline shocks in a multiple stage biological treatment plant

2008· article· en· W2044648120 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maria Sandberg, Ola Holby

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersForskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och VälfärdNuclear Safety and Security Commission
KeywordsBlack liquorPulp and paper industryActivated sludgeChemistrySewage treatmentEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To find the impact that alkaline and black liquor spills have on multiple stage biological treatment plants, trials were made in a MultiBio lab-scale treatment plant. It was shown that the concentration of black liquor was diluted between the multiple stages. The initial bacterial stages were inhibited by high concentration of black liquor but recovered when the concentration decreased. Low pH in the feed contaminated with black liquor gave less inhibition than high pH. In a MultiBio treatment plant the active sludge stages, which are sensitive to toxic spills, are placed after the fast growing bacterial stages and are therefore protected. During normal conditions the activated sludge stages receive low concentrations of biodegradable COD. During the trials extra COD in the form of diluted black liquor induced the COD reduction. To evaluate the results, measured concentrations were compared with a computer model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalFrench-language works237,207