Latent infection of peach caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Colletotrichum acutatum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Attached, immature peach fruits were mist-inoculated in the field with isolates of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides or Colletotrichum acutatum, beginning approximately 2 weeks before pit hardening and at regular intervals throughout the growing season until harvest. Immature fruits inoculated with either species initially remained symptomless or developed small, necrotic lesions that did not enlarge. Treatment with paraquat revealed the frequent presence of latent infections. Infections were not found in the noninoculated controls. Up to 100% of fruits inoculated with C. gloeosporioides developed anthracnose symptoms when mature. Inoculation with C. acutatum resulted in up tc 83% of the fruits developing symptoms at maturity. Inoculation date did not influence symptom development. Peach fruit may be infected with either C. acutatum or C. gloeosporioides early in development and remain symptomless until maturity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".