MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044674455 · doi:10.1142/s0218127411029379

SYNCHRONOUS/ASYNCHRONOUS PATTERNS IN THREE-CELL NETWORKS WITH MULTIPLE TIME DELAYS

2011· article· en· W2044674455 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFloquet theoryAsynchronous communicationComputationPerturbation (astronomy)MathematicsStability (learning theory)Symmetry (geometry)Series (stratigraphy)Applied mathematicsPerturbation theory (quantum mechanics)Term (time)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)Statistical physicsNonlinear systemAlgorithmPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some patterns of synchrony/asynchrony in the dynamics of coupled cell systems can be predicted by symmetry. However, in the system without symmetry, the different patterns of periodic solutions may exist as well. We consider a general model including three cells with multiple time delays that connect in any possible manner. Our approach is based on the analytic construction by using a perturbation procedure together with the Fredholm alternative theory. Then we employ the Poincaré–Lindstedt series expansion to compute the Floquet exponents which determine the stability. Finally, we resort to numerical computation to get some insights about the leading term in the Floquet exponents, and the numerical simulations are given to confirm the theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it