Bibliographic record
Abstract
491 rovibronic levels of electronically highly excited CaF have been analyzed using multichannel quantum defect theory (MQDT). These levels, observed in the experiments described in the preceding paper, correspond to effective principal quantum numbers ν [Formula: see text] 1218, partial wave components l = 03, and vibrationrotation quantum numbers ν = 1 and N = 014. A set of nondiagonal quantum defect matrices has been extracted from the experimental data by means of a global least-squares-fitting procedure, and is found to agree reasonably well with the theoretical quantum defect matrices calculated previously by Arif et al. J. Chem. Phys. 106, 4102 (1997) where the variational R-matrix method was used. The MQDT analysis accounts for rotationalelectronic nonadiabatic decoupling of the Rydberg electron from the rotating dipolar core as well as for strong l-mixing induced by the latter. The quantum defects determined for l = 3 yield approximate values for the core dipole and quadrupole moments. PACS Nos.: 33.10Lb, 34.50Gb, 34.60+z
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".