MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044702232 · doi:10.2202/1542-6580.1328

Simulation of a Two-Stage Micro Trickle-Bed Hydrotreating Reactor using Athabasca Bitumen-Derived Heavy Gas Oil over Commercial NiMo/Al <sub>2</sub> O <sub>3</sub> Catalyst: Effect of H <sub>2</sub> S on Hydrodesulfurization and Hydrodenitrogenation

2006· article· en· W2044702232 on OpenAlexafffund
Christian Botchwey, Ajay K. Dalai, John Adjaye

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
Canadian institutionsSyncrude (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSyncrudeUniversity of Connecticut
KeywordsHydrodenitrogenationHydrodesulfurizationTrickle-bed reactorChemistryHydrogen sulfideSpace velocitySulfideCatalysisSulfurOil sandsSulfidationFlue-gas desulfurizationOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceAsphaltComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A two-stage, micro trickle-bed reactor (for studies of the effects of hydrogen sulfide on hydrodesulfurization (HDS) and hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) of Athabasca bitumen-derived heavy gas oil over commercial NiMo/Al2O3 catalyst) has been simulated. One dimensional homogeneous mass transfer and a two dimensional heat transfer models were developed. The essence of the simulation was to enhance the understanding of the effects of hydrogen sulfide in the hydrotreating catalyst bed in a two-stage mode and also to predict the catalyst requirements for deep HDS and HDN processes. The kinetic model used in the simulation was based on the Langmuir-Hingshelwood method of rate determination. Adsorption constants were estimated by non-linear least squares method. The kinetic models were tested on independent set of data and found to predict the experimental data satisfactorily. The mass transfer simulation considered the effects of variables such as temperature and catalyst loading or liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) on the trends of hydrogen sulfide generation and, sulfur and nitrogen conversions along the catalyst bed. The model was numerically solved using a fourth-order Runge-Kutta technique. The 1:3 wt/wt catalyst loading with inter-stage hydrogen sulfide removal was found to give the best HDN and HDS activities. Simulated results showed that doubling the present catalyst mass and operating at 653 °C with inter-stage hydrogen sulfide removal would give 6 and 179 ppm product sulfur and nitrogen, respectively. On the other hand, without hydrogen sulfide removal, only 49 and 302 ppm product sulfur and nitrogen could be attained, respectively. The heat transfer simulation compared temperature profiles in the two-stage process to a single stage process for the 1:3 wt/wt catalyst loading at 653 K. The temperature regime in Stage II was found to be more uniform unlike Stage I and the single stage. Crank Nicholson algorithm was used to solve the 2-D partial differential equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Chemical Reactor EngineeringSame topicCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesFrench-language works237,207