Comparison of cold crystalloid and colloid infusions for induction of therapeutic hypothermia in a porcine model of cardiac arrest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Large-volume cold intravenous infusion of crystalloids has been used for induction of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. However, the effectiveness of cold colloids has not been evaluated. Therefore, we performed an experimental study to investigate the cooling effect of cold normal saline compared to colloid solution in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation. METHODS: Ventricular fibrillation was induced for 15 minutes in 22 anesthetized domestic pigs. After spontaneous circulation was restored, the animals were randomized to receive either 45 ml/kg of 1°C cold normal saline (Group A, 9 animals); or 45 ml/kg of 1°C cold colloid solution (Voluven, 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in 0.9% NaCl) during 20 minutes (Group B, 9 animals); or to undergo no cooling intervention (Group C, 4 animals). Then, the animals were observed for 90 minutes. Cerebral, rectal, intramuscular, pulmonary artery, and subcutaneous fat body temperatures (BT) were recorded. In the mechanical ex-vivo sub study we added a same amount of cold normal saline or colloid into the bath of normal saline and calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for induced temperature changes. RESULTS: Animals treated with cold fluids achieved a significant decrease of BT at all measurement sites, whereas there was a consistent significant spontaneous increase in group C. At the time of completion of infusion, greater decrease in pulmonary artery BT and cerebral BT in group A compared to group B was detected (-2.1 ± 0.3 vs. -1.6 ± 0.2°C, and -1.7 ± 0.4 vs. -1.1 ± 0.3°C, p < 0.05, respectively). AUC analysis of the decrease of cerebral BT revealed a more vigorous cooling effect in group A compared to group B (-91 ± 22 vs. -68 ± 23°C/min, p = 0.046). In the mechanical sub study, AUC analysis of the induced temperature decrease of cooled solution revealed that addition of normal saline led to more intense cooling than colloid solution (-7155 ± 647 vs. -5733 ± 636°C/min, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous infusion of cold normal saline resulted in more intense decrease of cerebral and pulmonary artery BT than colloid infusion in this porcine model of cardiac arrest. This difference is at least partially related to the various specific heat capacities of the coolants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".