Triaxial frequency sweep characterization of Saskatchewan hot mix asphaltic concrete across asphalt cement binder type
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to determine how asphalt cement binder types influence the mechanical behaviour of hot mix asphalt concrete mixes. This research employed triaxial frequency sweep characterization of a typical City of Saskatoon Hot Mix Type A2 and a typical Saskatchewan Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure Hot Mix Type 70 across a range of triaxial load frequencies and stress states representative of Saskatchewan field state conditions. The asphaltic mixes were evaluated across four asphalt cement binder types typically employed by Saskatchewan road agencies. Based on the findings of this study, the mechanical behaviour of both asphalt mixes evaluated were found to be highly sensitive to load rate, stress state, as well as asphaltic binder type. It was concluded that load rate, field stress state, and asphalt binder type should be incorporated into the structural design of hot mix asphalt concrete pavements to ensure adequate mix performance, particularly when placed in severe field conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".