Corrosion Behaviour of Nanocrystalline Zn-Ni and Zn-Ni-Co Electrodeposits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, alternatives to corrosion-resistant cadmium coatings on high strength steel fasteners are explored. Nanocrystalline Zn-Ni and Zn-Ni-Co electrodeposits, synthesized by electrochemical deposition, were analyzed by potentiodynamic polarization in a 1M NaCl aqueous solution, to determine the corrosion behaviour of the alloys. Sample coatings were characterized using scanning electron microscopy to examine differences in surface morphology that can affect corrosion resistance. Energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy was used to relate composition to corrosion resistance and to characterize the corrosion behavior during polarization. All coatings showed corrosion potentials at equivalent, or lower values than that of cadmium, suggesting that both alloys are viable as cadmium replacements. Specific compositions showed slightly passivating regions, but the brittle film formed during polarization is unstable. Comparatively, Zn-Ni shows a better resistance to corrosion than Zn-Ni-Co. The effect of composition on the corrosion resistance can be explained on the basis of the sacrificial depletion of Zn over Ni.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".