MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044762474 · doi:10.5539/ep.v1n1p12

Antibody Functionalised Gold Nanoprobes Based Colorimetric Assay for the Direct Detection of Phenylurea Herbicide

2011· article· en· W2044762474 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Priyanka Sharma, Bipul Kumar, C. Raman Suri

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironment and Pollution · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColloidal goldDetection limitAbsorbanceDynamic light scatteringImmunoassayChemistryChromatographyNanoparticleColorimetric analysisMaterials scienceNanotechnologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One-step homogeneous colorimetric immunoassay format for direct detection of herbicide diuron is reported. Gold nanoparticles (30 nm) functionalised with specific anti-diuron antibody was used as bioprobes for the development of non-crosslinking hybridization method, where aggregation of the gold-nanoprobes is induced by an increasing salt concentration, and is prevented by the amount of antigen (diuron) present in sample solution. The aggregation profile of the antibody functionalised gold nanoparticles directed by the immunoreaction was investigated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS) and was further confirmed colorimetrically by measuring the change in the absorption ratio (620/520 nm) with increasing amounts of diuron. The assay exhibited an excellent sensitivity and specificity based on absorbance profile showing the dynamic response range from 0.1-50 ng/mL for diuron with a detection limit of ~5 ng/mL. The new technique could be used for fast, high-throughput screening of pesticides in environmental diagnostics at a very low cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironment and PollutionSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207