Conjoined Hemoglobins. Loss of Cooperativity and Protein−Protein Interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hemoglobin cross-linked as a bis(isophthalamide) of the epsilon-amino groups of lysine 82 of each beta-subunit binds and releases oxygen with a Hill coefficient indicative of cooperative oxygen binding (typically approximately 2.0). However, connecting two such cross-linked tetramers with a relatively short covalent linkage produces cross-linked bis-tetramers that bind oxygen with Hill coefficients near unity. To separate the effect of the linkages from the effects of protein-protein interactions in the conjoined proteins, reagents (1 and 2) were used to produce bis-tetramers (A and B). These have a considerably greater distance between cross-linked tetramers than earlier examples. Yet, the bis-tetramers (A and B) bind oxygen with minimal cooperativity (n(50) = 1.4, 1.2). To assess the effect of the linkage itself, cross-linked tetramers (Cand D) were prepared from reactions with the same reagents. These bind oxygen with cooperativity similar to that of cross-linked tetramers without the extended chain (C, n(50) = 2.0; D, n(50) = 1.8). Other tetramers (E and F) with flexible, saturated hydrocarbon appendages were also prepared. These also showed cooperativity in oxygen binding (E, n(50) = 1.7; F, n(50) = 1.8) despite their high degree of hydrophobicity. Thus, the intertetrameric linkages themselves do not induce the loss of cooperativity, leading to the conclusion that solution effects of the tetramers upon one another are the source of the decline in cooperativity: protein-protein interactions are most significant in disrupting the cooperativity of the bis-tetramers, regardless of the span or composition of the linker. This suggests that effects of oligomerization of hemoglobin within red cell substitutes should be considered in terms of such interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".